Homosexuals

Author	Comment
S Michael Simms	Homosexuals	Lead	[-]
Posts: 3047 (10/05/06 16:02:02) Boogeyman/Chief Mod Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Come, let us yak about the manifold faces of fu@kery... - Smikes
bluezoe	Re: Homosexuals	#1	[-]
Posts: 3319 (10/17/06 08:10:40) Killing poetry since 1994/Chief Mod Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts Report Post	i think straight is from "straight and narrow". Like we're all missionary and boring. Queer used to mean odd, different, unconventional. It has been applied to homosexuality because to the straight and narrow, it may seem odd and is definately unconventional. i think we are all "bi-sexual" at our basest selves. We control those impulses. Fantasies. Try as we might to differentiate ourselves, to be original, we usually remain with boundaries set by the whole. Even within the homosexual community there are standards for fitting in. i will never understand why someone would choose to be gay. There's so much drama, so much fighting and persecuation involved. Anyone who would choose such a life for a certain type of sex would seem crazy. i think people are born with their particular sexuality. It is out of their hands, just like men are out of mine.
paura nella	Re: Homosexuals	#2	[-]
Posts: 1639 (12/11/06 09:03:08) Artistic Hack/Mod Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts Report Post	According to the Kinsey report, very few people are actually comepletely homosexual or hetrosexual, but fall in a spectrum of in between somewhere. Some gear toward homosexuality more then others, others toward hetrosexuality. The Kiney study suggests social conditioning and surrounding circumstances play an important role of forcing people to choose from one extreme to the other, when in actuallity we are all bi-sexual to a degree.
MethMaker	Re: Homosexuals	#3	[-]
Posts: 281 (01/28/07 11:05:15) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts Report Post	I don't think that the question of nature/nurture with respect to homosexuality is important. Socially speaking, the question smacks of fear and even has eugenic connotations.
S Michael Simms		#4	[-]
Posts: 3037 (06/17/09 22:27:48) Boogeyman/Chief Mod Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Really? Well, I think you're a cocksucker. How's that grab you, Liberace? Now...THAT smacked of fear and eugenic connotations. A simple question of whether or not a specific lifestyle is brought on by choice, design, conditioning or what have you is nothing more than a question. It is the right and responsibility of intelligent people to ask such things and seek real answers so that when the subject comes up...oh, I don't know...from the mouth of a child, say? There is an answer to give. Questioning the motives of a question with a brazen overtone of political assholiness smacks of fear and eugenic connotations. Put that in your skin pipe & smoke it. - Smikes

Yuku free message boards

Homosexuals

Quick Reply